Marshall Islands vs New Zealand: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Marshall Islands
89.2%
in 2019
New Zealand
89.2%
in 2019
Marshall Islands rank
87th
New Zealand rank
86th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Marshall Islands
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 89.2% against 89.2% in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was New Zealand ahead.
Marshall Islands ranks 87th and New Zealand ranks 86th of 191 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.4% | 96.2% | 0.9% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 90.0% | 90.5% | 0.5% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Marshall Islands or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 89.2% against 89.2% in Marshall Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Marshall Islands and New Zealand?
- 0.0%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and New Zealand?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Marshall Islands and New Zealand rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Marshall Islands ranks 87th and New Zealand ranks 86th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.