Marshall Islands vs Sao Tome and Principe: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Marshall Islands
89.2%
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
89.0%
in 2019
Marshall Islands rank
87th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
88th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Marshall Islands
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 89.2% against 89.0% in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.
Marshall Islands ranks 87th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 88th of 191 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.4% | 85.5% | 9.9% | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 90.0% | 88.0% | 2.0% | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Marshall Islands or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Marshall Islands, at 89.2% against 89.0% in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Marshall Islands and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.2%, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Marshall Islands and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Marshall Islands ranks 87th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 88th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.