Montenegro vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Montenegro
75.6%
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
73.2%
in 2019
Montenegro rank
132nd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
135th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Montenegro
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 75.6% against 73.2% in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 2.4%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
Montenegro ranks 132nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 135th of 191 countries.
Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 24.1% | 24.1% | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2010s | 34.0% | 56.3% | 22.3% | Tanzania, United Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Montenegro or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Montenegro, at 75.6% against 73.2% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Montenegro and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 2.4%, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Montenegro and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Montenegro ranks 132nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 135th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.