Tanzania, United Republic of vs Tonga: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Tanzania, United Republic of
73.2%
in 2019
Tonga
71.7%
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
135th
Tonga rank
137th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Tanzania, United Republic of
- Tonga
How they compare
Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 73.2% against 71.7% in Tonga, a difference of 1.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tonga ahead.
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 135th and Tonga ranks 137th of 191 countries.
Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tanzania, United Republic of | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.3% | 40.3% | 21.0% | Tonga |
| 2010s | 56.3% | 64.6% | 8.3% | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Tanzania, United Republic of or Tonga?
- Tanzania, United Republic of, at 73.2% against 71.7% in Tonga as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Tanzania, United Republic of and Tonga?
- 1.5%, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Tonga?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Tanzania, United Republic of and Tonga rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 135th and Tonga ranks 137th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.