Australia vs South Korea: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Australia
- South Korea
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 85.98 against 83.71 in Australia, a difference of 2.27.
Across all 10 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 10th and South Korea ranks 8th of 184 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.38 | 86.88 | 5.5 | South Korea |
| 2010s | 83.71 | 86.22 | 2.51 | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Australia or South Korea?
- South Korea, at 85.98 against 83.71 in Australia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Australia and South Korea?
- 2.27, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and South Korea?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Australia and South Korea rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Australia ranks 10th and South Korea ranks 8th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.