Eswatini vs Tonga: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Eswatini
- Tonga
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 75.86 against 75.57 in Tonga, a difference of 0.29.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 38th and Tonga ranks 41st of 181 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.54 | 64.39 | 11.14 | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 75.54 | 74.31 | 1.23 | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Eswatini or Tonga?
- Eswatini, at 75.86 against 75.57 in Tonga as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Eswatini and Tonga?
- 0.29, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Tonga?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Eswatini and Tonga rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Eswatini ranks 38th and Tonga ranks 41st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.