Korea, Rep. vs Taiwan: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Korea, Rep.
- Taiwan
How they compare
Taiwan currently reports 86.14 against 85.98 in Korea, Rep., a difference of 0.16.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Korea, Rep. ahead.
Korea, Rep. ranks 8th and Taiwan ranks 7th of 181 countries.
Korea, Rep. has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Korea, Rep. | Taiwan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.88 | 65.64 | 21.24 | Korea, Rep. |
| 2010s | 86.22 | 78.3 | 7.92 | Korea, Rep. |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Korea, Rep. or Taiwan?
- Taiwan, at 86.14 against 85.98 in Korea, Rep. as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Korea, Rep. and Taiwan?
- 0.16, with Taiwan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Korea, Rep. and Taiwan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Korea, Rep. and Taiwan rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Korea, Rep. ranks 8th and Taiwan ranks 7th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.