South Korea vs United Kingdom: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- South Korea
- United Kingdom
How they compare
United Kingdom currently reports 86.82 against 85.98 in South Korea, a difference of 0.84.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was South Korea ahead.
South Korea ranks 8th and United Kingdom ranks 5th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.88 | 73.47 | 13.41 | South Korea |
| 2010s | 86.22 | 86.61 | 0.3961 | United Kingdom |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, South Korea or United Kingdom?
- United Kingdom, at 86.82 against 85.98 in South Korea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between South Korea and United Kingdom?
- 0.84, with United Kingdom ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and United Kingdom?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do South Korea and United Kingdom rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- South Korea ranks 8th and United Kingdom ranks 5th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.