North Macedonia vs Paraguay: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- North Macedonia
- Paraguay
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 76.21 against 75.99 in Paraguay, a difference of 0.22.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Paraguay ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 35th and Paraguay ranks 37th of 183 countries.
Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.8 | 56.57 | 4.77 | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 71.51 | 74.33 | 2.82 | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, North Macedonia or Paraguay?
- North Macedonia, at 76.21 against 75.99 in Paraguay as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between North Macedonia and Paraguay?
- 0.22, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Paraguay?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do North Macedonia and Paraguay rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- North Macedonia ranks 35th and Paraguay ranks 37th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.