Antigua and Barbuda vs Guinea: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Antigua and Barbuda
65.74
in 2019
Guinea
65.85
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
116th
Guinea rank
115th

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Guinea
0204060201420162019

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 65.85 against 65.74 in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.11.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 116th and Guinea ranks 115th of 188 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Guinea?
Guinea, at 65.85 against 65.74 in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Guinea?
0.11, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Guinea?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Guinea rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 116th and Guinea ranks 115th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.