Antigua and Barbuda vs Slovenia: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Slovenia
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 65.74 against 65.33 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.41.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 117th and Slovenia ranks 119th of 190 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Slovenia?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 65.74 against 65.33 in Slovenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Slovenia?
- 0.41, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Slovenia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Slovenia rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 117th and Slovenia ranks 119th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.