Argentina vs Moldova: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Argentina
- Moldova
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 56.44 against 56.24 in Moldova, a difference of 0.2.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Moldova ahead.
Argentina ranks 154th and Moldova ranks 155th of 188 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Argentina or Moldova?
- Argentina, at 56.44 against 56.24 in Moldova as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Argentina and Moldova?
- 0.2, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Moldova?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Moldova rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Argentina ranks 154th and Moldova ranks 155th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.