Australia vs Luxembourg: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Australia
84.74
in 2019
Luxembourg
83.87
in 2019
Australia rank
11th
Luxembourg rank
14th

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Australia
  • Luxembourg
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Australia currently reports 84.74 against 83.87 in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.87.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 11th and Luxembourg ranks 14th of 188 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Australia or Luxembourg?
Australia, at 84.74 against 83.87 in Luxembourg as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Australia and Luxembourg?
0.87, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Luxembourg?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Australia and Luxembourg rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Australia ranks 11th and Luxembourg ranks 14th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.