Australia vs Mauritius: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Australia
84.74
in 2019
Mauritius
85.77
in 2019
Australia rank
11th
Mauritius rank
8th

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Australia
  • Mauritius
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 85.77 against 84.74 in Australia, a difference of 1.03.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 11th and Mauritius ranks 8th of 188 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Australia or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 85.77 against 84.74 in Australia as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Australia and Mauritius?
1.03, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Mauritius?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Australia and Mauritius rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Australia ranks 11th and Mauritius ranks 8th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.