Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Nicaragua: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 48.57 against 46.33 in Nicaragua, a difference of 2.24.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 174th and Nicaragua ranks 177th of 191 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Nicaragua?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 48.57 against 46.33 in Nicaragua as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Nicaragua?
- 2.24, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Nicaragua?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Nicaragua rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 174th and Nicaragua ranks 177th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.