Burkina Faso vs San Marino: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- San Marino
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 68.91 against 68.68 in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.23.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 95th and San Marino ranks 92nd of 191 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Burkina Faso or San Marino?
- San Marino, at 68.91 against 68.68 in Burkina Faso as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Burkina Faso and San Marino?
- 0.23, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and San Marino?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Burkina Faso and San Marino rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 95th and San Marino ranks 92nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.