Congo, Dem. Rep. vs Gabon: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Congo, Dem. Rep.
59.51
in 2019
Gabon
59.78
in 2019
Congo, Dem. Rep. rank
143rd
Gabon rank
140th

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Congo, Dem. Rep.
  • Gabon
0204060201420162019

How they compare

Gabon currently reports 59.78 against 59.51 in Congo, Dem. Rep., a difference of 0.27.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Gabon ahead.

Congo, Dem. Rep. ranks 143rd and Gabon ranks 140th of 188 countries.

Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Congo, Dem. Rep. or Gabon?
Gabon, at 59.78 against 59.51 in Congo, Dem. Rep. as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Congo, Dem. Rep. and Gabon?
0.27, with Gabon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Dem. Rep. and Gabon?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Congo, Dem. Rep. and Gabon rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Congo, Dem. Rep. ranks 143rd and Gabon ranks 140th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.