Cyprus vs Papua New Guinea: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Cyprus
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 64.54 against 64.15 in Cyprus, a difference of 0.39.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 124th and Papua New Guinea ranks 121st of 188 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Cyprus or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 64.54 against 64.15 in Cyprus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Cyprus and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.39, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Papua New Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Cyprus and Papua New Guinea rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Cyprus ranks 124th and Papua New Guinea ranks 121st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.