Finland vs Montenegro: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Finland
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 76.08 against 75.93 in Finland, a difference of 0.15.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 42nd and Montenegro ranks 40th of 188 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Finland or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 76.08 against 75.93 in Finland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Finland and Montenegro?
- 0.15, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Montenegro?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Finland and Montenegro rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Finland ranks 42nd and Montenegro ranks 40th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.