Guinea-Bissau vs Niger: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Guinea-Bissau
45.24
in 2019
Niger
44.15
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau rank
175th
Niger rank
178th

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Niger
01020304050201420162019

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 45.24 against 44.15 in Niger, a difference of 1.09.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 175th and Niger ranks 178th of 188 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Guinea-Bissau or Niger?
Guinea-Bissau, at 45.24 against 44.15 in Niger as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Guinea-Bissau and Niger?
1.09, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Niger?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Niger rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 175th and Niger ranks 178th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.