Guinea-Bissau vs Venezuela, República Bolivariana de: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Venezuela, República Bolivariana de
How they compare
Venezuela, República Bolivariana de currently reports 46.45 against 45.24 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 1.21.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Venezuela, República Bolivariana de has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 177th and Venezuela, República Bolivariana de ranks 175th of 190 countries.
Venezuela, República Bolivariana de has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Guinea-Bissau or Venezuela, República Bolivariana de?
- Venezuela, República Bolivariana de, at 46.45 against 45.24 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Guinea-Bissau and Venezuela, República Bolivariana de?
- 1.21, with Venezuela, República Bolivariana de ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Venezuela, República Bolivariana de?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Venezuela, República Bolivariana de rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 177th and Venezuela, República Bolivariana de ranks 175th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.