Libya vs Syrian Arab Republic: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Libya
0
in 2019
Syrian Arab Republic
0
in 2019
Libya rank
184th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
184th

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Libya
  • Syrian Arab Republic
00.20.40.60.81201420162019

How they compare

Libya currently reports 0 against 0 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Syrian Arab Republic has been ahead every year.

Libya ranks 184th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 184th of 188 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Libya or Syrian Arab Republic?
Libya, at 0 against 0 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Libya and Syrian Arab Republic?
0, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Syrian Arab Republic?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Libya and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Libya ranks 184th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 184th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.