Marshall Islands vs Spain: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Marshall Islands
71.09
in 2019
Spain
70.8
in 2019
Marshall Islands rank
76th
Spain rank
79th

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Marshall Islands
  • Spain
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Marshall Islands currently reports 71.09 against 70.8 in Spain, a difference of 0.29.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.

Marshall Islands ranks 76th and Spain ranks 79th of 188 countries.

Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Marshall Islands or Spain?
Marshall Islands, at 71.09 against 70.8 in Spain as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Marshall Islands and Spain?
0.29, with Marshall Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Spain?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Marshall Islands and Spain rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Marshall Islands ranks 76th and Spain ranks 79th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.