Mauritania vs Nepal: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Mauritania
66.86
in 2019
Nepal
67.3
in 2019
Mauritania rank
108th
Nepal rank
106th

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Mauritania
  • Nepal
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 67.3 against 66.86 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.44.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Nepal ahead.

Mauritania ranks 108th and Nepal ranks 106th of 188 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Mauritania or Nepal?
Nepal, at 67.3 against 66.86 in Mauritania as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Mauritania and Nepal?
0.44, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Nepal?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Mauritania and Nepal rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Mauritania ranks 108th and Nepal ranks 106th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.