Mauritius vs New Zealand: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Mauritius
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 86.46 against 85.77 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.69.
Across all 6 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 8th and New Zealand ranks 7th of 190 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Mauritius or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 86.46 against 85.77 in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Mauritius and New Zealand?
- 0.69, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and New Zealand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and New Zealand rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Mauritius ranks 8th and New Zealand ranks 7th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.