New Zealand vs Taïwan: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- New Zealand
- Taïwan
How they compare
Taïwan currently reports 87.12 against 86.46 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.66.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 7th and Taïwan ranks 6th of 190 countries.
Taïwan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, New Zealand or Taïwan?
- Taïwan, at 87.12 against 86.46 in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between New Zealand and Taïwan?
- 0.66, with Taïwan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Taïwan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Taïwan rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- New Zealand ranks 7th and Taïwan ranks 6th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.