Pakistan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Pakistan
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 66.64 against 66.46 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.18.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Pakistan ranks 112th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 111th of 191 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Pakistan or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 66.64 against 66.46 in Pakistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Pakistan and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.18, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Pakistan and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Pakistan ranks 112th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 111th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.