Democratic Republic of Congo vs Ecuador: Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes
Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Ecuador
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Ecuador, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 42nd and Ecuador ranks 42nd of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes, Democratic Republic of Congo or Ecuador?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Ecuador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes between Democratic Republic of Congo and Ecuador?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Ecuador?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Ecuador rank globally for dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 42nd and Ecuador ranks 42nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes index (0-2) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The liability and insurance regimes index evaluates the stringency of latent defect liability and insurance regimes. It has two components: (i) whether any parties involved in the construction process are held legally liable for latent defects such as structural flaws or problems in the building once it is in use; (ii) whether any party involved in the construction process is legally required to obtain a latent defect liability or decennial (10 years) liability insurance policy to cover possible structural flaws or problems in the building once it is in use. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.