Germany vs Malawi: Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes
Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes over time
- Germany
- Malawi
How they compare
Germany currently reports 0.5 DB16-20 methodology against 0.5 DB16-20 methodology in Malawi, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Germany ranks 113th and Malawi ranks 113th of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes, Germany or Malawi?
- Germany, at 0.5 DB16-20 methodology against 0.5 DB16-20 methodology in Malawi as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes between Germany and Malawi?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Malawi?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Germany and Malawi rank globally for dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes?
- Germany ranks 113th and Malawi ranks 113th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes index (0-2) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The liability and insurance regimes index evaluates the stringency of latent defect liability and insurance regimes. It has two components: (i) whether any parties involved in the construction process are held legally liable for latent defects such as structural flaws or problems in the building once it is in use; (ii) whether any party involved in the construction process is legally required to obtain a latent defect liability or decennial (10 years) liability insurance policy to cover possible structural flaws or problems in the building once it is in use. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.