Guinea vs San Marino: Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes
Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes over time
- Guinea
- San Marino
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in San Marino, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.
Guinea ranks 42nd and San Marino ranks 42nd of 186 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes, Guinea or San Marino?
- Guinea, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in San Marino as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes between Guinea and San Marino?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and San Marino?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Guinea and San Marino rank globally for dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes?
- Guinea ranks 42nd and San Marino ranks 42nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes index (0-2) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The liability and insurance regimes index evaluates the stringency of latent defect liability and insurance regimes. It has two components: (i) whether any parties involved in the construction process are held legally liable for latent defects such as structural flaws or problems in the building once it is in use; (ii) whether any party involved in the construction process is legally required to obtain a latent defect liability or decennial (10 years) liability insurance policy to cover possible structural flaws or problems in the building once it is in use. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.