Namibia vs Nicaragua: Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes
Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes over time
- Namibia
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0.5 DB16-20 methodology against 0.5 DB16-20 methodology in Nicaragua, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 113th and Nicaragua ranks 113th of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes, Namibia or Nicaragua?
- Namibia, at 0.5 DB16-20 methodology against 0.5 DB16-20 methodology in Nicaragua as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes between Namibia and Nicaragua?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Nicaragua?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Namibia and Nicaragua rank globally for dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes?
- Namibia ranks 113th and Nicaragua ranks 113th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes index (0-2) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The liability and insurance regimes index evaluates the stringency of latent defect liability and insurance regimes. It has two components: (i) whether any parties involved in the construction process are held legally liable for latent defects such as structural flaws or problems in the building once it is in use; (ii) whether any party involved in the construction process is legally required to obtain a latent defect liability or decennial (10 years) liability insurance policy to cover possible structural flaws or problems in the building once it is in use. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.