Singapore vs United States of America: Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes

Singapore
0 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
United States of America
0.4 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Singapore rank
128th
United States of America rank
127th

Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes over time

  • Singapore
  • United States of America
00.20.40.60.81201420162019

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 0.4 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Singapore, a difference of 0.4 DB16-20 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Singapore ahead.

Singapore ranks 128th and United States of America ranks 127th of 186 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes, Singapore or United States of America?
United States of America, at 0.4 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Singapore as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes between Singapore and United States of America?
0.4 DB16-20 methodology, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and United States of America?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Singapore and United States of America rank globally for dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes?
Singapore ranks 128th and United States of America ranks 127th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes index (0-2) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs United States of America: Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/dealing-with-construction-permits-liability-and-insurance-regimes-index-0-2-db16-20/singapore/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/dealing-with-construction-permits-liability-and-insurance-regimes-index-0-2-db16-20/singapore/united-states/">Singapore vs United States of America: Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes index (0-2) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 1,115 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The liability and insurance regimes index evaluates the stringency of latent defect liability and insurance regimes. It has two components: (i) whether any parties involved in the construction process are held legally liable for latent defects such as structural flaws or problems in the building once it is in use; (ii) whether any party involved in the construction process is legally required to obtain a latent defect liability or decennial (10 years) liability insurance policy to cover possible structural flaws or problems in the building once it is in use. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.