Australia vs Mozambique: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Australia
76
in 2019
Mozambique
76
in 2019
Australia rank
27th
Mozambique rank
27th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Australia
  • Mozambique
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Australia currently reports 76 against 76 in Mozambique, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 27th and Mozambique ranks 27th of 188 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Mozambique Difference Ahead
2000s 80 76 4 Australia
2010s 78.4 76 2.4 Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Australia or Mozambique?
Australia, at 76 against 76 in Mozambique as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Australia and Mozambique?
0, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Mozambique?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Australia and Mozambique rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Australia ranks 27th and Mozambique ranks 27th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.