Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score (Score) in Australia
Australia: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score was 76 in 2019. ▼ Falling
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score in Australia, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Australia recorded 76 for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 15 years on record.
That represents a change of down 5.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in Australia peaked at 80 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 76, in 2016.
That places Australia 27th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 15 years of available data.
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score in Australia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 80 | — |
| 2006 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 76 | -5.0% |
| 2017 | 76 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 76 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 76 | +0.0% |
Australia compared with similar countries
- Australia's 76 is above the median for high income countries, which is 67.8, 1.1× the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Australia's 76 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 62, 1.2× the median. (28 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80 | 80 | 80 | 5 |
| 2010s | 78.4 | 76 | 80 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Australia
- 27 Austria 76 compare
- 27 Comoros 76 compare
- 27 Dominica 76 compare
- 27 Georgia 76 compare
- 27 Guatemala 76 compare
- 27 Iraq 76 compare
- 27 Luxembourg 76 compare
- 27 Mozambique 76 compare
- 27 New Zealand 76 compare
- 27 Norway 76 compare
- 27 Serbia 76 compare
- 27 United Arab Emirates 76 compare
- 27 Venezuela 76 compare
More private sector data for Australia
- Merchandise trade 36.0% (2025)
- Food imports 6.5% (2025)
- Manufactures imports 74.3% (2025)
- Merchandise imports 310.63 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 13.7% (2025)
- Manufactures exports 9.8% (2025)
- Merchandise exports 337.58 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 12,225 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.1877 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate -0.9521 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in Australia?
- Dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in Australia was 76 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score recorded in Australia?
- The highest recorded value was 80 in 2005.
- What is the lowest dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score recorded in Australia?
- The lowest recorded value was 76 in 2016.
- How does Australia rank for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Australia ranks 27th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Australia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Australia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.