Australia vs United Arab Emirates: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Australia
76
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
76
in 2019
Australia rank
27th
United Arab Emirates rank
27th
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Australia
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Australia currently reports 76 against 76 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 27th and United Arab Emirates ranks 27th of 188 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80 | 51.2 | 28.8 | Australia |
| 2010s | 78.4 | 70.4 | 8 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Australia or United Arab Emirates?
- Australia, at 76 against 76 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Australia and United Arab Emirates?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and United Arab Emirates?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Australia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Australia ranks 27th and United Arab Emirates ranks 27th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.