Bahamas vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Bahamas
52
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina
52
in 2019
Bahamas rank
124th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
124th
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Bahamas
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 52 against 52 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.
Bahamas ranks 124th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 124th of 191 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52 | 54.67 | 2.67 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 52 | 52 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Bahamas or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Bahamas, at 52 against 52 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Bahamas and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 0, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Bahamas and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Bahamas ranks 124th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 124th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.