Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bosnia and Herzegovina: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score was 52 in 2019. ▼ Falling
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2019, dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in Bosnia and Herzegovina stood at 52. That is the lowest value across all 15 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in Bosnia and Herzegovina peaked at 60 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 52, in 2008.
That places Bosnia and Herzegovina 124th out of 190 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 15 years of available data.
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score in Bosnia and Herzegovina, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 60 | — |
| 2006 | 60 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 60 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 52 | -13.3% |
| 2009 | 52 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 52 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 52 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 52 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 52 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 52 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 52 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 52 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 52 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 52 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 52 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.8 | 52 | 60 | 5 |
| 2010s | 52 | 52 | 52 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Bosnia and Herzegovina
- 124 Argentina 52 compare
- 124 Bahamas 52 compare
- 124 Cape Verde 52 compare
- 124 Central African Republic 52 compare
- 124 Costa Rica 52 compare
- 124 Ecuador 52 compare
- 124 Finland 52 compare
- 124 Greece 52 compare
- 124 Honduras 52 compare
- 124 Iceland 52 compare
- 124 Kazakhstan 52 compare
- 124 Kyrgyzstan 52 compare
- 124 Madagascar 52 compare
- 124 Mongolia 52 compare
- 124 Papua New Guinea 52 compare
- 124 Sierra Leone 52 compare
- 124 Slovenia 52 compare
- 124 Uzbekistan 52 compare
More private sector data for Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Merchandise trade 83.3% (2025)
- Food imports 18.2% (2025)
- Manufactures imports 63.7% (2025)
- Merchandise imports 17.33 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 7.4% (2025)
- Manufactures exports 72.2% (2025)
- Merchandise exports 9.81 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 3,125 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.301 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate 10.38 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in Bosnia and Herzegovina was 52 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- The highest recorded value was 60 in 2005.
- What is the lowest dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- The lowest recorded value was 52 in 2008.
- How does Bosnia and Herzegovina rank for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 124th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
- Is dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Bosnia and Herzegovina data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.