Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ecuador: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
52
in 2019
Ecuador
52
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
124th
Ecuador rank
124th
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Ecuador
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 52 against 52 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 124th and Ecuador ranks 124th of 191 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.8 | 52 | 4.8 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 52 | 52 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Ecuador?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 52 against 52 in Ecuador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 124th and Ecuador ranks 124th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.