Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kyrgyzstan: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
52
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
52
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
124th
Kyrgyzstan rank
124th
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 52 against 52 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 124th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 124th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.8 | 31.2 | 25.6 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 52 | 53.6 | 1.6 | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Kyrgyzstan?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 52 against 52 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 124th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 124th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.