Cameroon vs Timor-Leste: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Cameroon
56
in 2019
Timor-Leste
56
in 2019
Cameroon rank
107th
Timor-Leste rank
107th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Cameroon
  • Timor-Leste
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 56 against 56 in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cameroon ahead.

Cameroon ranks 107th and Timor-Leste ranks 107th of 188 countries.

Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
2000s 74.4 56 18.4 Cameroon
2010s 60 56 4 Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Cameroon or Timor-Leste?
Cameroon, at 56 against 56 in Timor-Leste as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Cameroon and Timor-Leste?
0, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Timor-Leste?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Cameroon and Timor-Leste rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Cameroon ranks 107th and Timor-Leste ranks 107th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.