Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score (Score) in East Timor
East Timor: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score was 56 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score in East Timor, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2019, dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in East Timor stood at 56. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in East Timor peaked at 56 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 56, in 2005.
East Timor ranks 107th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score in East Timor, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 56 | — |
| 2006 | 56 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 56 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 56 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 56 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 56 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 56 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 56 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 56 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 56 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 56 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 56 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 56 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 56 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 56 | +0.0% |
East Timor compared with similar countries
- East Timor's 56 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 56.88, 98% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- East Timor's 56 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 62, 90% of the median. (28 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56 | 56 | 56 | 5 |
| 2010s | 56 | 56 | 56 | 10 |
Countries ranked near East Timor
- 104 Nigeria 58.76 compare
- 105 Bangladesh 56.88 compare
- 106 United States 56.8 compare
- 107 Belize 56 compare
- 107 Botswana 56 compare
- 107 Cameroon 56 compare
- 107 Djibouti 56 compare
- 107 El Salvador 56 compare
- 107 Ghana 56 compare
- 107 Guinea 56 compare
- 107 Iran 56 compare
- 107 Kenya 56 compare
- 107 Kiribati 56 compare
- 107 Malta 56 compare
- 107 Myanmar 56 compare
- 107 Sao Tome and Principe 56 compare
- 107 Seychelles 56 compare
- 107 Sudan 56 compare
- 107 Trinidad and Tobago 56 compare
More private sector data for East Timor
- Merchandise trade 56.9% (2025)
- Food imports 28.1% (2023)
- Manufactures imports 49.6% (2023)
- Merchandise imports 979.00 million current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 10.5% (2023)
- Manufactures exports 21.9% (2023)
- Merchandise exports 103.00 million current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 72.61 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.0541 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate 19.77 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in East Timor?
- Dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in East Timor was 56 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score recorded in East Timor?
- The highest recorded value was 56 in 2005.
- What is the lowest dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score recorded in East Timor?
- The lowest recorded value was 56 in 2005.
- How does East Timor rank for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- East Timor ranks 107th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in East Timor?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this East Timor data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.