Kazakhstan vs Papua New Guinea: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Kazakhstan
52
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
52
in 2019
Kazakhstan rank
124th
Papua New Guinea rank
124th
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Kazakhstan
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 52 against 52 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 124th and Papua New Guinea ranks 124th of 190 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 52 | 52 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 27.2 | 52 | 24.8 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Kazakhstan or Papua New Guinea?
- Kazakhstan, at 52 against 52 in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Kazakhstan and Papua New Guinea?
- 0, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Papua New Guinea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Kazakhstan and Papua New Guinea rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Kazakhstan ranks 124th and Papua New Guinea ranks 124th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.