Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score (Score) in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score was 52 in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score in Kazakhstan, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Kazakhstan recorded 52 for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
The figure is up 8.3% on the previous year and up 550.0% over five years.
Over the whole period, dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in Kazakhstan peaked at 52 in 2019 and was at its lowest, 0, in 2005.
Kazakhstan ranks 124th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0 | — |
| 2006 | 0 | — |
| 2007 | 0 | — |
| 2008 | 0 | — |
| 2009 | 0 | — |
| 2010 | 8 | — |
| 2011 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 36 | +350.0% |
| 2016 | 48 | +33.3% |
| 2017 | 48 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 48 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 52 | +8.3% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 52 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 60, 87% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 52 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 64, 81% of the median. (49 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 2010s | 27.2 | 8 | 52 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 124 Argentina 52 compare
- 124 Bahamas 52 compare
- 124 Bosnia and Herzegovina 52 compare
- 124 Cape Verde 52 compare
- 124 Central African Republic 52 compare
- 124 Costa Rica 52 compare
- 124 Ecuador 52 compare
- 124 Finland 52 compare
- 124 Greece 52 compare
- 124 Honduras 52 compare
- 124 Iceland 52 compare
- 124 Kyrgyzstan 52 compare
- 124 Madagascar 52 compare
- 124 Mongolia 52 compare
- 124 Papua New Guinea 52 compare
- 124 Sierra Leone 52 compare
- 124 Slovenia 52 compare
- 124 Uzbekistan 52 compare
More private sector data for Kazakhstan
- Merchandise trade 46.8% (2025)
- Food imports 11.0% (2024)
- Manufactures imports 81.0% (2024)
- Merchandise imports 64.46 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 6.1% (2024)
- Manufactures exports 20.9% (2024)
- Merchandise exports 78.79 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 3,780 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.2573 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate -4.46 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in Kazakhstan?
- Dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in Kazakhstan was 52 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 52 in 2019.
- What is the lowest dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2005.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Kazakhstan ranks 124th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.