Kazakhstan vs Slovenia: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Kazakhstan
52
in 2019
Slovenia
52
in 2019
Kazakhstan rank
123rd
Slovenia rank
123rd

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Slovenia
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 52 against 52 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.

Kazakhstan ranks 123rd and Slovenia ranks 123rd of 188 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Slovenia Difference Ahead
2000s 0 44.8 44.8 Slovenia
2010s 27.2 50.8 23.6 Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Kazakhstan or Slovenia?
Kazakhstan, at 52 against 52 in Slovenia as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Kazakhstan and Slovenia?
0, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Slovenia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Kazakhstan and Slovenia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Kazakhstan ranks 123rd and Slovenia ranks 123rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.