Suriname vs Zambia: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Suriname
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Zambia
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Suriname rank
135th
Zambia rank
135th
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Suriname
- Zambia
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Zambia, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Suriname ranks 135th and Zambia ranks 135th of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Suriname or Zambia?
- Suriname, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Zambia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Suriname and Zambia?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Zambia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Suriname and Zambia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Suriname ranks 135th and Zambia ranks 135th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.