Dealing with construction: Quality control after in Zambia
Zambia: Dealing with construction: Quality control after was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction in Zambia, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction in Zambia stood at 2 DB16-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Zambia ranks 135th of 186 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Dealing with construction: Quality control after in Zambia, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2015 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Zambia compared with similar countries
- Zambia's 2 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 3 DB16-20 methodology, 67% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Zambia's 2 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 2 DB16-20 methodology, 1.0× the median. (46 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Zambia
- 132 Nigeria 2.77 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 133 Brazil 2.39 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 134 Mexico 2.17 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Angola 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Antigua and Barbuda 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Benin 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Bolivia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Burundi 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Cambodia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Cameroon 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Central African Republic 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Comoros 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Democratic Republic of Congo 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Congo 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Cote d'Ivoire 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Dominica 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Ethiopia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 France 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Gabon 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Gambia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Germany 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Ghana 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Grenada 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Guinea 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Guinea-Bissau 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Guyana 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Haiti 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Iraq 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Jamaica 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Kenya 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Kiribati 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Lesotho 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Madagascar 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Mali 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Mauritania 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Niger 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Poland 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Sao Tome and Principe 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Senegal 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Solomon Islands 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 South Sudan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Sudan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Suriname 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 East Timor 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Togo 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
More private sector data for Zambia
- Merchandise trade 91.7% (2025)
- Food imports 7.8% (2024)
- Manufactures imports 64.4% (2024)
- Merchandise imports 13.17 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service imports 2.17 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 8.7% (2024)
- Manufactures exports 14.1% (2024)
- Merchandise exports 13.31 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports 1.39 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 607.56 current US$ per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction in Zambia?
- Dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction in Zambia was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction recorded in Zambia?
- The highest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- What is the lowest dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction recorded in Zambia?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- How does Zambia rank for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Zambia ranks 135th out of 186 countries with data for 2019.
- Is dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction rising or falling in Zambia?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Zambia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.