Austria vs East Timor: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control before
Austria
0 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
East Timor
0 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Austria rank
163rd
East Timor rank
163rd
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control before over time
- Austria
- East Timor
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in East Timor, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 163rd and East Timor ranks 163rd of 185 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control before, Austria or East Timor?
- Austria, at 0 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in East Timor as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control before between Austria and East Timor?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and East Timor?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Austria and East Timor rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control before?
- Austria ranks 163rd and East Timor ranks 163rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control before construction index (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control before construction index evaluates quality control in the review of the building plans. The index measures whether by law, a licensed architect or engineer is part of the committee or team that reviews and approves building permit applications and whether that person has the authority to refuse an application if the plans are not in conformity with regulations. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.