Australia vs Peru: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control during construction
Australia
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Peru
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Australia rank
1st
Peru rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control during construction over time
- Australia
- Peru
How they compare
Australia currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Peru, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 1st and Peru ranks 1st of 185 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control during construction, Australia or Peru?
- Australia, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control during construction between Australia and Peru?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Peru?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Peru rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control during construction?
- Australia ranks 1st and Peru ranks 1st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control during construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control during construction index evaluates quality control during the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether inspections are mandated by law during the construction process; (ii) whether inspections during construction are implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.