Rwanda vs Sweden: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control during
Rwanda
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Sweden
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Rwanda rank
1st
Sweden rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control during over time
- Rwanda
- Sweden
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Sweden, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 185 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control during, Rwanda or Sweden?
- Rwanda, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Sweden as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control during between Rwanda and Sweden?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sweden?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Rwanda and Sweden rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control during?
- Rwanda ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control during construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control during construction index evaluates quality control during the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether inspections are mandated by law during the construction process; (ii) whether inspections during construction are implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.