Australia vs Congo, Dem. Rep.: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Australia
72.77
in 2019
Congo, Dem. Rep.
72.33
in 2019
Australia rank
72nd
Congo, Dem. Rep. rank
75th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Australia
  • Congo, Dem. Rep.
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Australia currently reports 72.77 against 72.33 in Congo, Dem. Rep., a difference of 0.44.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 72nd and Congo, Dem. Rep. ranks 75th of 188 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Congo, Dem. Rep. Difference Ahead
2000s 68.3 38.62 29.68 Australia
2010s 74.19 71.07 3.13 Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Australia or Congo, Dem. Rep.?
Australia, at 72.77 against 72.33 in Congo, Dem. Rep. as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Australia and Congo, Dem. Rep.?
0.44, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Congo, Dem. Rep.?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Australia and Congo, Dem. Rep. rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Australia ranks 72nd and Congo, Dem. Rep. ranks 75th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.